Bibliographie complète
Not always about you: Prioritizing community needs when developing endangered language technology
- Liu, Zoey (Author)
- Richardson, Crystal (Author)
- Hatcher, Richard (Author)
- Prud'hommeaux, Emily (Author)
- Muresan, Smaranda (Editor)
- Nakov, Preslav (Editor)
- Villavicencio, Aline (Editor)
Key points
Classify low-resource languages into 3 categories:
- Elephant = many speakers, well supported (ex. Danish)
- Ocelot = fewer speakers, well supported (ex. Yiddish)
-
Coyote = few speakers, little support (ex. Kodi)
- often lack of standardized written form = mostly oral languages + dialectal/idiolectal variation
- sometimes face(d) linguicide
Revitalization major goal = facilitating usage in wider contexts
Tools that help most:
- //classroom education
- //developping new usage situations
Shift from “linguist-focused model” to “Community-Based Language Research” -> community has the central role in the research, helped by outsider linguists
Survey speakers of different languages with different roles (teachers, L1/L2 speakers) on various technologies + general written documentation
« For many of these languages, the priorities of the speech communities are how to more effectively document, teach, and reclaim their language; how to save the cultural heritage passed down from the elders; and how to let their language have a voice among other widely-spoken or dominant languages » (Liu et al., 2022, p. 3938)
Recommendations:
- Build bonds with indigenous communities responsibly and sensitively
- Recognize community members who made meaningful contribution (co-authors or else appropriate)
- describe data collection protocols and challenges
- Explicit plans for sharing, archiving, storing the data (incl. with the speech community)
- Consult with speech communities when building language technologies
- Find ways to incorporate technology output into the work of the speech community